State aid debate central to aviation’s uncertain post-pandemic future | DW | 14.05.2021

For Marc, a young pilot flying with a European national flag carrier, one of the strangest things about his job during the pandemic has been the silence.

“When you are flying over London for example, that is one of the busiest airspaces in the world,” he told DW. “And now you don’t hear or see any other plane in the sky, which usually would be absolutely jammed with other airlines talking and everything happening. All of a sudden, it is dead quiet on the radio. It’s eerie.”

Not that he has much opportunity to take in the strangeness. Since March 2020, he has only flown on average two return trips per month. His wages have been slashed and he has seen less experienced colleagues, and those working in cabin crew positions, fall into financial difficulty. And he calls himself one of “the lucky ones.”

His pandemic flying experience has ranged from flying an entire plane with a single passenger aboard — “which is just bizarre, you are kind of thinking, ‘what is the point of this?'” — to flying in vaccines and other essential equipment.

“With that, there was a feeling that you are contributing,” he says. “A big problem when you are not working is that you feel a bit helpless: What am I doing, can I help anyone out?’ So that feeling that you are helping out the country a bit…and even talking to the passengers we did fly, they were mostly flying essential journeys, meaningful journeys. Just the fact that we were able to do that was rewarding.”

Many scheduled flights over the past year have been practically empty

Marc spoke to DW on the condition that his airline would not be mentioned because “job security isn’t really great these days.” Like many in the sector, he is worried about what the drama of the last year will mean for his profession in the future.

State aid pumped into national flag carriers

From flying vaccines or medical equipment around the world to helping passengers make essential journeys during the pandemic, aviation’s essential role can hardly be argued with.

Government support of the aviation sector is a serious bone of contention at present though, from multiple perspectives.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented upheaval in the industry and airlines have lost mind-boggling amounts of revenue (see graphic). The crisis has led to a dramatic pivot after years of privatization, with governments pumping ever-larger amounts of state aid into national carriers.

Infografik Aviation's coronavirus collapse EN

The trend has been especially strong in Europe. Italy nationalized Alitalia early on in the crisis, while last month, the French government upped its stake in Air France-KLM to 30%. In Germany, the government spent €9 billion ($10.9 billion) on a 20% stake in Lufthansa while the Swedish and Portuguese governments have also taken stakes in SAS and TAP Air Portugal respectively.

It’s not only flag carriers who have had to tap new resources. Even Ryanair, the leading critic of the European bailouts, accepted special pandemic financing in the form of a $730 million loan from the UK government.

Yet while dozens of airlines across the Continent have availed of liquidity through a range of government offerings, there is a clear dividing line.

According to the ‘European airline bailout tracker’ run by Greenpeace and environmental groups Transport & Environment and Carbon Market Watch, European governments have already given around €30 billion in financial aid.

Of that amount, close to half applies to just two airlines: Lufthansa and Air France-KLM, while other national carriers added together account for the vast majority of remaining funds dispersed.

Ryanair’s legal fight

The European Commission gave the green light to the funding but attached conditions, such as forcing carriers to give up prized airport slots.

But Ryanair’s CEO Michael O’Leary is furious and has been typically blunt in what he sees as unfair state aid. He says airlines such as Air France will never pay back the billions given to it by the French government and that the deals are unfair on airline groups such as his.

German autobahn

An empty motorway leading to Frankfurt Airport, early on in the pandemic speaks volumes about decreasing air travel

“We, easyJet, IAG and the others have to compete with these state-aid, crack cocaine junkies,” he said.

Ryanair launched a legal battle against state aid in various European courts. The common thread in the argument is that the kind of support received by Lufthansa and Air France-KLM is discriminatory. It has lost all the cases so far heard but the airline remains confident of its future chances.

The emissions question

What the bailout situation means for the future of aviation in Europe is a matter of serious debate. Some analysts take the view that ultimately, airlines that survive the pandemic without state aid will become more efficient and more competitive in the longer run.

Others take an opposite view. “For many airlines, the absence of government support could ultimately mean disaster, especially for the large carriers,” Shukor Yusof, the founder of aviation consultancy Endau Analytics, told Bloomberg. Ryanair itself has echoed similar sentiments.

Airplane on the ground

An airplane carrying 2 million doses of AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccines from India lands at Galeao Air Base in Rio de Janeiro

There is another side to the entire question and that relates to the environment and the need for EU governments to reduce carbon emissions, with aviation an obvious heavy contributor. Greenpeace launched its tracker to highlight the extent to which governments have bailed out airlines without strict environmental conditions.

“Injecting taxpayers’ money into this very polluting industry with no environmental strings attached makes no sense at all,” Greenpeace transport policy adviser Lorelei Limousin told DW. “Returning to normal is really not an option.”

She says Greenpeace is not opposed to public support for airlines, but that billions of public money should be directed towards supporting workers and the fight to reduce emissions, rather than simply to put pre-pandemic volumes of planes back in the air.

Airlines argue that the massive daily cash burn caused by having airplanes on the ground makes such an approach impossible in a pandemic.

That points towards the many valid but competing claims at the center of the debate on aviation’s post-pandemic future, whether it is airlines striving to thrive or simply survive, environmentalists looking to reduce emissions or pilots and cabin crew looking to get back to work in the clouds again.


Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button